On Halloween, some women are tricks and some are treats. Please don’t get me wrong, I’m not calling all women the “H” word, but let’s not be naive. There are tons of wholesome women (emphasis on the ho sound) disguising themselves as ladies—they will offer you treats. It’s these “ladies” who portray themselves as something else on this evening who are the tricks.
What? I’m keeping it too real? Well, go read someone else’s article. But if this sounds interesting, I encourage you to read on.
Halloween is to promiscuous women as St. Patrick’s Day is to alcoholics. Drunkards use it as an excuse to get drunk. Wholesome women use it as an excuse to be open about who they really are and not feel judged. Why else would they dress up like a Playmate, seductive nurse, nun, devil or Kim Kardashian?
I give you my word that I am not ragging on wholesome women, either. I’m a huge Kanye wannabe, so I embrace every aspect of this new lifestyle our youthful generation has created.
Guys and gals follow the teachings of the great philosopher and rapper Trinidad James, who says “f**k love it’s overrated.” They also recite lyrics from the good book of Kendrick Lamar, “I am a sinner.”
Halloween is the perfect time to sin again.
The thing is, not everyone is “’bout that life,” as they claim to be. I’m referring to you, ladies, and I’m here to let you know that it’s okay to have morals and standards. You might be overlooked on Halloween like the house that gives out healthy snacks instead of chocolates and candy, though.
Now, here’s a tip for you fellas: don’t get tricked by these ladies. They are not giving up their treats to just anybody. Those houses with the best candy are always in the better neighborhoods. I’ll let you know how to spot them.
If “Pop That” by rapper French Montana comes on, and she dances with her knees more than she uses her waist, she’s definitely a lady. You might have to remove your cap before introducing yourself to her.
Also, the shoe has to fit. If her personality doesn’t match her outfit, then she only came out to flex on Instagram. Don’t be the sucker who thinks you’re in there because she asked you to take a photo with her. Naw, playa. She’s just going to “snicker” at your “bar” because her and her Three Musketeers came together, and are leaving together.
So, with that being said, enjoy your Halloween, keep your candy wrapped up, play a few tricks and get that treat.
What the hell is this misogynistic garbage?
He’s clearly encouraging women to uphold their standards, carry themselves with a sense of pride and not succumb to the expectations our society has perpetuated our sisters and daughters are to follow on Halloween such as dressing up in a scandalous attire that doesn’t reflect who they really are
Not only is this article poorly written and lacking in any kind of rational argument for the author’s position, but I also can’t say I agree with their premise that it’s in any way their place to dictate how women are allowed to express their sexuality, whether it’s Halloween or not. If the author is so concerned about women “showing off the goods,” I fail to see how trying to shame women by calling them “wHOlesome” or whatever nonsense that is would be in any way effective. This article doesnt encourage a return to moral standards. It expresses a desire to try to make women abide by their own moral standards through the guise of calling them sluts and whores if they don’t. And then also accuses them of being teases if they won’t give a “treat” when they’re so clearly dressed sexily. I mean, what is this garbage? As loath as I am to say it, attitudes like this are what perpetrate rape culture and misogynistic approaches to female sexuality. Utter shite. It’s embarrassing that this was published.
Ok ok, say you work at Chick-fil-a. You wear a black or maroon polo and some work pants to work. Say you’re a business executive. You wear business attire to work. Say you’re an adult entertainer and one night every year you see a significant increase in people wearing the uniform you wear to work. Ask yourself, how familiar would you be with your co-workers?
The article wasn’t the most well-written and apologies to all…more or less on a case by case basis. It was meant to be just comedy, first. Articles with “bout that life” aren’t meant to be taken too seriously. Some of the word play was a little off (and the missing content from the original prevented this from coming full circle).
The aim was to reinforce to males that on that night, what they perceive may not be reality and to treat a lady as such.