9 to 5? Try 5 to 9.

The greatest geniuses sometimes accomplish more when they work less.

Leonardo Da Vinci is credited with this statement. After being asked to work harder during work on his masterpiece “The Last Supper,” he replied with what I feel to be a great reflection on modern work in our society.

Fast forward to today and we see that unfortunately not many people agree with the laid-back lifestyle of Da Vinci.

The House of Representatives recently passed a bill that states that under Obamacare, a “full-time” job is now defined as a 40-hour work week (as opposed to the previous definition set at 30 hours). While this might seem like an arbitrary change to some, it brings to light a big issue: employees getting their hours cut so that they don’t qualify for health care. I’ll touch on this topic another time.

The bigger question should be why in the world are we working 40-hour weeks? How many of those 40 hours are actually spent working? Why don’t we have the 15-hour work week that famous economist John Maynard Keynes predicted would be the norm by the year 2000?

There are lots of questions and unfortunately not many answers. A 15-hour work week (3-4 hours a day) seems like some futuristic utopia that you might see in a science fiction novel. But with all of our technological advances and breakthroughs in labor efficiency, why does the average American work 46.7 hours per week?

To help begin to tackle these questions, let’s take a quick look back at the most American invention since burgers and fries: the 40-hour work week. In the roaring ‘20s, factory owners pushed their employees to the brink of exhaustion with 10-16 hour work days.

Enter Henry Ford who sees overworked employees as a liability not for their safety but for his sales. His rationale was that if there were a 5 day work week, people would have more time off and in turn more time to — you’ll never believe this — realize they needed to go out and buy stuff. In Ford’s own words, “Leisure is an indispensable ingredient in a growing consumer market because working people need to have enough free time to find uses for consumer products, including automobiles.”

So in some strange turn of deceptively dastardly events, the work week as we know it was invented to give us more time to go consume and spend the money we worked all week to earn. And that’s exactly what we do! But that’s yet another topic on personal finance and delayed gratification for another time, my friends. We’ve got issues at hand!

The 40-hour work week has been commonplace since its inception, but I’m here to tell you it doesn’t have to stay that way! Studies have shown that we all have a 24-hour sleep cycle and some are more “night owls” and some are “early risers.” While everyone assumes night owls just need to get over it and work a 9-5 job, tests prove some workers are more efficient and produce more when working a later work schedule.

A University of Brussels study showed that participants who woke up at noon opposed to the early birds at 6 a.m. had less mental fatigue and higher attention spans 10 hours after waking up. So we have a little science to help denounce the 40-hour work week, but it’s more than just feeling alert or not — there’s a lot of emotional and mental fatigue of being overworked week in and week out.

But there’s hope yet. A web company named Quirky has begun to shut down their company for a four week block during the year. In an e-mail to employees, CEO Ben Kaufman wanted his employees to have time to just unplug for a while. “Time for us to explore other creative interests. Relax without worrying about what we’re missing.”

Or take Cristian Rennella, the owner of a Latin American search engine, who grew his company over 200 percent after allowing all employees to take fridays off. I love ideas like these and I hope other companies try other experiments with the work week in the future.

While I know drastic changes won’t happen anytime soon, I am in full support of any and all small businesses who are taking unique approaches to the work week. Many entrepreneurs are realizing that the best way to productive, alert, happy employees is through alternative work weeks and unique vacation plans.

Hopefully more and more will get on board in the years to come. Until then, as the great Dolly Parton once said, “Workin’ 9 to 5, what a way to make a living. Barely getting by, it’s all taking and no giving.”

3 Comments

  1. Way to go, Mitchell! We think no rigid workweek, 15 hours or even shorter, is adequate. It has to be a sustainable homeostatic fluctuation against underemployment, because the worksaving technology is not frozen – it keeps coming in – so the human workweek can’t be frozen either. Walter Reuther called it fluctuating adjustment of the workweek against unemployment way back in 1964 at the UAW convention in Atlantic City. More on our website, Timesizing.com – Phil Hyde
    PS – It also helps enormously if you don’t leave to chance the conversion of chronic overtime into training and jobs before and during the downward adjustment of the workweek till full employment is reached.

  2. The US as a leading world power lags far behind other industrialized nations in so many ways. One of which is the 40 hour work week and the other is maternity leave for parents. In Italy they have the afternoon “siestas” where businesses simply close down for a few hours so everybody can chill. I loved it! Americans are very stressed because all most of us do is work, work work, in order to spend, spend, spend, which breeds insanity. I really enjoyed your article and found very insightful and forward thinking. Stop the madness already.

    • What you’re saying is that the US has gone from a leader to a follower, or maybe it’s too near-sighted & arrogant to follow anywhere else no matter how much better elsewhere is working… – on Timesizing.com under ‘hope du jour’ (near the top) every day, I put a couple of stories about workweek reduction that I get from Google news searches on things like ’35 hours’ or ’30 hours’ & there are plenty of people like yourself who feel “full-time workweek” reduction would be a fabulous lifestyle OPTION – the focus I’m gradually shifting to is that workweek reduction has become a system REQUIREMENT in the age of robotics and artificial intelligence, because without workweek reduction we downsize our workforce to retain 40 hours for the diminished number of full-time employees, and downsizing the workforce downsizes our American consumer base and American wages, thanks to all the extra laid-off people anxiously looking for a job and willing to take less – where does all the extra money go that isn’t being spread out into wages by labor shortage or at least not surplus? – funnels right up to the topmost brackets where it is effectively wasted! waaay more than they can spend, and the top brackets donate a smaller percentage than any lower brackets! and since they’re constantly vacuuming money out of consumer spending, they’re constantly weakening the markets for the productivity they need for solid investments – get the picture? Life-style shmife-style – we HAVE to cut the workweek & convert overtime into jobs or we will just keep weakening our home markets & spiralling downward from ‘world power’ to ‘third world’…

Comments are closed.